image title

ASU professor says Prince Harry's marriage unlikely to rile royal family dynamics

December 1, 2017

Prince Harry’s recent engagement to American actress Meghan Markle is a contemporary Grace Kelly/Prince Rainier love story. As expected, media and other palace watchers in Britain and Hollywood have been set abuzz by the couple’s glamorous pairing, which includes such compelling storylines as race, divorce, family lineage and power.

ASU Now asked Retha Warnicke, a professor in the School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies and author of seven booksWarnicke’s latest book is "Elizabeth of York and Her Six Daughters-in-Law: Fashioning Tudor Queenship, 1485-1547", Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. on Tudor women, to unravel the mystery of how the monarchy will handle the arrival of Markle on the scene. 

Woman in glasses smiling
Retha Warnicke

Question: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s engagement has made headlines around the world. What has been the reaction of the royal family and British citizens that an American will be a member of nobility?

Answer: That she is American seems to be no more publicly noticed than that she is bi-racial. After all, Queen Elizabeth's husband is of Greek descent. It has been a common practice for the royal family to marry foreigners, including Victoria and her son Edward VII. All the excitement about Edward VIII was that his chosen wife, an American, was a divorcee. Recently, this has not been so much the trend, partly because there are fewer royal families in positions of importance. And arranged marriages have gone out of style, at least since Charles married Princess Diana. 

Q: The fact that Prince Harry has selected a multi-racial, divorced American actress, what does it say about the monarchy today? 

A: Harry has always been a kind of maverick. But the royal family has survived other mavericks intact, from Edward VIII, for example, to Princess Margaret, to the Prince of Wales, who also married a divorced spouse. Every generation seems to produce at least one maverick, but I don't see much difference in the basic traditions of the royal family. The duke and duchess of Cambridge seem to be somewhat traditional, although she comes from a middle-class family not the aristocracy. Even if Harry sires children with a bi-racial woman, none of them is likely to come close to the queenship or kingship. Finally, if Queen Elizabeth could put up with her sister's antics, I think putting up with Harry will be easier.

I must also point out that I think they have been living together for several months in the Nottingham Cottage on the Kensington Palace grounds. I read that he proposed to her when they were roasting a chicken at the cottage where they were living. So the royal family must have known this might be in the works for some time.

Q: How big an impact can Meghan Markle play in the royal hierarchy? 

A: It depends on the members of the royal family, but Harry has shown no great desire personally to fit in and make an impact, except to catch the notice of gossip columnists. I assume she will be invited to family parties and can reciprocate if Harry wants to do so. Even though she is older than he, I doubt that she will want to take over communications with his family. She has to learn traditions first, although she probably is at least vaguely aware of many of them, as they seem to have been a couple for some months.

Q: Can Prince Harry, who is fifth in line to the throne (but soon to be sixth), have much of an impact given the power structure?

A: I should not think he would have any impact at all, but perhaps now he will behave himself. I think he will be sixth in line soon after the birth of William and Kate’s third child. How much influence has Charles's sister Anne had on the power structure? None, I think.   

Q: Why would Queen Elizabeth not approve the marriage? 

A: There have not been arranged marriages in the royal family since Philip insisted that Charles marry Princess Diana. Can you imagine the reaction of maverick Harry if she turned down his choice? It is the tradition and perhaps even the law to ask her approval, but I think he would have to want to marry a vagabond to get a no response. The power of the queen is illusory. She agrees to statutes, but then she has to; she approves of marriages but then she mostly has to. She can no longer even choose her prime minister, as George VI chose Winston. The party now chooses its leader.

Top photos: The gates of Buckingham Palace. Courtesy of Pixabay.

 
image title

ASU entrepreneurs earn over $250,000 in investment funding at Demo Day

ASU's brightest entrepreneurs score thousands in investment funding.
December 3, 2017

Winning student startups at competition include a solar-powered skateboard rack and a platform aimed at preventing suicide

Every entrepreneur wants to make money, but essentially what they’re working to create is a better life for humanity.

Student entrepreneurs at Arizona State University have invented software that tracks when people are in a mental health crisis, a game to help ease childhood anxiety, an innovative pool security monitor and an app that finds nearby parking spaces.

Those were among the two dozen ASU-affiliated startups that won more than $250,000 in investment funding at the Demo Day entrepreneurship competition on Friday. The projects are part of Venture Devils, a program in the Office of Entrepreneurship + Innovation at ASU that provides space, mentorship and access to funding to students, faculty, staff or community members. Nearly 100 ASU-affiliated teams pitched their ventures to a panel of judges at the daylong event, held at SkySong in Scottsdale.

Many of the ventures represent years of hard work.

“I’ve spent the last seven years working on this project as part of my PhD training,” said Ryan Stoll, co-founder of Compass for Courage, one of the big winners at Demo Day. His team won $22,500 in investment funding.

“It takes a lot to get into this market — a lot of expertise.”

Compass for Courage makes an interactive curriculum for children that uses board games and role-playing to help them learn skills to overcome anxiety. Stoll, a doctoral candidate in clinical psychology at ASU, co-founded the project with Armando Pina, an associate professor in the School of Psychology.

The program is already used in 26 Arizona schools as part of ongoing research, Stoll told the judges, and they have purchasing agreements with 80 more schools.

And their aspirations are bigger.

“Anxiety is just a start. We want our customers in the future to be able to create their own mental health curriculums that account for their unique needs and strengths,” Stoll said.

Pat Pataranutaporn, a junior in the School of Life Sciences, pitches for Humanity X Technologies at Demo Day. Photo by Charlie Leight/ASU Now

Demo Day combined several competitions that previously were held separately. One of them, the Pakis Social Entrepreneurship Challenge, gave out $7,500 to three ventures that the judges believed would benefit their communities: Compass for Courage; Hygiea, which created a waste-management technology; and Humanity X Technologies, which makes ARKHumanity, a platform for real-time detection of social media messages that may predict suicidal thinking. Those three ventures will now get additional mentoring and will compete for the $27,000 grand prize from the Pakis Family Foundation, which will be awarded at the next Demo Day, on April 27.

Like Compass for Courage, some ventures won funding from more than one source at Demo Day, and the prizes varied. The eSeed Challenge gave grants of $1,000 to a dozen teams, while the Edson Student Entrepreneur Initiative awarded nine prizesThe $10,000 winners were Curio, which makes experiential learning technology, and Urban Farming Organics, a nonprofit that will turn vacant land into organic community gardens. The $15,000 winners were Compass for Courage; Aquaponos, a hydroponic-gardening system; ArmsReach Industries, which makes space-saving organizational products; Halen, which makes Pool Sense, a pool-monitoring technology; Fellman Watch Co., which makes wristwatches; Pursuit Health Technologies, which makes a cloud-based platform for personal trainers; and Billibars, a detachable handlebar system for bicycle storage. of $10,000 or $15,000.

One new funding source was the Global Sport Venture Challenge, a competition for sports-related businesses that’s funded by the Global Sport Institute, a new research and inquiry unit at ASU. Five teamsThe winners were Hoolest, which makes a device to ease performance anxiety; Billibars, a detachable handlebar system for bike storeage; Pursuit Health, which created a cloud technology for fitness trainers; Power House Foods, a healthy-foods catering system; and Trestle Automation, a solar-powered skateboard-storage rack. won $1,000 each, plus mentorship and the chance to compete for the $5,000 grand prize in April.

Brent Sebold, executive director of venture development at Entrepreneurship + Innovation at ASU, said the Global Sport Venture Challenge makes sense for ASU’s entrepreneurs because “I brag that the 600 student founders are synonymous to the 600 student-athletes we have at ASU. ..."

Many of the entrepreneurs became passionate about their ideas because of their own personal journeys. One of the sport-challenge winners, Miguel Carrillo, weighed 385 pounds a decade ago and lost nearly 200 pounds through healthy eating and working out. His venture, Power House Foods, will serve healthy meals to gym members. He’ll spend his $1,000 prize on catering equipment to start his business, eventually scaling up to a food truck and a restaurant.

“I’ve already proven myself to my friends, family and loved ones,” said Carrillo, who is a senior majoring in business entrepreneurship.

ASU’s students will get to try out one of the winning products — a solar-powered skateboard rack. Trestle Automation, a team of five engineering and computer science students and alumni, created a new type of skateboard storage that doesn’t require students to carry around a padlock. The device, which will be placed near the Memorial Union on the Tempe campus next spring, uses students’ Sun Cards to activate the locking mechanism.

“The main issue is that a lot of students just forget their locks and that makes the racks useless,” said Tarek Salama, a senior in computer science. “Plus students are always late to class. But we have to carry our cards.”

The team will use the funding to tweak and weatherproof their prototype, which they hope to sell for $2,500 to universities.

Demo Day also was a celebration of all of ASU’s entrepreneurs, past and present. ASU alum Keith Ryu talked to the group about his Silicon Valley startup, Fountain, an automated-hiring platform that has earned $11 million in investment funding. Ryu, who graduated in 2014, lived off his ASU venture funding while he launched his company in San Francisco. He described his tough first year, which involved endless rejection, a technical consultant who didn’t respond when the website crashed, a lawsuit and the entrepreneurial equivalent of couch-surfing from office to office.

“I was helping them to take out the trash and stuff,” he said. “But that helped me see what a startup looked like.”

He also learned how to bluff.

“It was funny to see our perception of money,” he said. “We started asking for $40,000 but no one was interested, so then we upped it to $100,000 and we got a lot more interest.”

Ryu said that when he was a student entrepreneur, he thought that ideas were the most important part of a startup.

“Then I realized that ideas are cheap and execution is everything,” he said.

“If you can’t believe in what you’re doing and put your back against the wall, the investors won’t take that risk.”

For details on ASU Venture Devils, click here.

Top photo: Mona Davis, an ASU alum, pitches her venture, Charity Auction Trades, a platform for nonprofit groups to raise more money, on Friday at SkySong in Scottsdale. She won a $1,000 grant from the eSeed Challenge. Photo by Charlie Leight/ASU Now

Mary Beth Faller

reporter , ASU Now

480-727-4503