image title

Q&A: How to help coastal communities build weather resilience

The time to talk about coastal resilience is now, says ASU professor.
October 5, 2017

ASU professor part of group of researchers charged with identifying sources of coastal resiliency, implementing them in Caribbean

As extreme weather events become more commonplace, regions of the world that get hit the hardest are often left scrambling to put the pieces of their homeland back together.

Sian Mooney, associate dean and professor at Arizona State University's New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, researches the use of natural resources and the environment. She recently returned from a trip to Cuba, where the economist attended a tri-national workshop on the theme: “Enhancing Resilience of Coastal Caribbean Communities.”

It couldn’t have been more timely.

“This is certainly a great time to be looking at [coastal resilience],” Mooney said, “because the time we had the workshop was right after Hurricane Irma, and while we were there, Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico.”

The group of scientists and researchers gathered for the event have been charged with defining and identifying sources of coastal resiliency and then working to implement them in the region over the next few years. It was the first convening of the group and the project is still in the planning and discovery phase, but Mooney was game to speak with ASU Now about initial discussions and potential trajectories.

woman smiling

Sian Mooney

Question: How urgent is it that we address the issue of coastal resilience?

Answer: The time is now to be looking at coastal resilience in the Caribbean. It’s time to find out what are the interventions or policies that make the most sense for each area, because it’s very diverse, so the same things don’t make sense from place to place. It’s a very complex issue.

Q: How is the region faring at the moment?

A: It really varies from location to location because in the Caribbean, you have small islands and large coastlines, like those along Florida and part of Mexico. So you can’t really define one state of coastal resilience, but one thing we can say is it’s certainly becoming much more of an issue of concern, with greater numbers of hurricanes, high winds and weather-related factors affecting the region.

When I was in Cuba, the country had just been hit by Hurricane Irma, and very fortunately for Cuba, it had not been hit by the high winds of Hurricane Irma. It was mostly subject to extremely high tides, which caused flooding and rain. But Havana showed very little evidence of the area having been hit by a hurricane, except for the boardwalk area, which was completely closed because it had been completely eroded away. But old town HavanaOld Havana is the city center and one of the 15 municipalities forming Havana, Cuba. and the surrounding areas showed very little evidence, at least to the naked eye, that anything untoward had occurred. In comparison, I had spent the evening before arriving in Cuba in Miami, and it looked like a war zone. There were trees down everywhere, piles of shrubs, power lines down, boats piled up on top of each other.

Q: What factors influence an area’s ability to be resilient?

A: We need to be looking both at communities and the physical nature of the land. One factor is topography, what does the land look like? Is it mountainous or low-lying? Also, human development and settlements. Have people located their homes right on a beach? Have they created instances where they have removed lots of vegetation so there is increased erosion and greater saltwater inundation or high tide?

One of the topics that came up really frequently [at the workshop] as having a big impact on coastal resilience, particularly in the Caribbean, was tourism. Tourism might encourage more development on coasts [which is not resilient], and it also creates a strain on resources in some areas because you need more water, more food, more infrastructure to support the tourism industry. And certainly, the Caribbean is very dependent on tourism for much of its income.

Q: Are there any efforts currently underway to promote coastal resilience?

A: In Cuba, they’ve already started to move the community away from the coast and resettle them in other areas. It’s really complicated because people become very attached to houses and areas where they grew up. So even when new housing was provided, people still had a tendency to keep going back and living in their old houses.

Q: What are the next steps?

A: One thing we talked about [at the workshop] was what does resilience actually mean? It can be viewed in many different ways depending on if you’re a physical scientist, a natural scientist, a social scientist. Also, communities might define for themselves very different definitions of resiliency. So I’ll be working with local communities and scientists to try and understand what does the local populace really understand about coastal resilience? What are their thoughts, what do they feel resilience might look like? And then come up with ways we can help them adapt to the future and have healthy, active and productive lives.

It’s a new area of research I’m looking forward to. We’re going to write two papers as a result of the workshop: one looking at resilience and adaptive capacity, and the other looking at the relationship between food, water and health systems, because they’re all related, and if you disturb one of those systems, it impacts the others. So those are the two areas we’re going to start with.

Top photo: A beach in Cuba. Photo courtesy of Sian Mooney

image title

ASU ramps up water research

October 5, 2017

University's water initiative, Future H2O, to focus on solutions, not scarcity

Arizona State University’s water initiative announced a sweeping new strategic plan this week.

Spurning the typical narrative of scarcity, Future H2O will face a goal of abundant water for vibrant communities, economies and ecosystems.

“What we’re doing is building new partnerships,” director John SaboSabo is a professor in the School of Life Sciences, a senior sustainability scientist in the Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability and affiliated faculty in the Center for Biodiversity Outcomes. said. “All of the proposals we make, we want to have a solution at the end of the pipeline.”

The initiative’s goals include becoming a hub for transdisciplinary water scholarship at ASU; creating a new research culture embracing all water issues; emerging as a national leader in externally funded solutions-oriented water research; expanding ASU’s engagement on water globally; engaging the private sector; improving access to and use of big data on water; and creating and promoting a water narrative focusing on positive change.

“There’s a lot of research out there that says we’re going to hell in a handbasket,” Sabo said.

Here Sabo talks about the current state of water research and where the new plan is headed.

Question: Where is water research at ASU falling short, and what does the new strategic plan do to address those gaps?

Answer: I think we’re doing excellent stuff, really top-notch research, but I think what happens is we don’t do the work we need to do to get science-informed policy out there. We need to have scientists in the trenches interacting. The reason why this doesn’t happen is because the incentives aren’t there, and that takes time. If you’re a faculty member, it’s time you’re not writing proposals or papers. If you engage with decision makers, these folks who need research but don’t know what you can provide, it makes us more competitive in a market that’s completely saturated. ... Some of those RFPs [requests for proposals] get 400 proposals — how do you stand out?

man speaking at event

Ecologist and Professor John Sabo speaks at the ASU Water Summit and its update on the Future H2O program on Oct. 3 at the University Club in Tempe. The luncheon focused on interdisciplinary solutions to the local, regional, national and global water scarcity. Photo by Charlie Leight/ASU Now

Q: How does coming from a mind-set of water abundance (vs. water scarcity) change how you approach water research?

A: A lot of the conversation about water is how bad our institutions are, and how poorly matched they are for the future, where there’s more people. I think creating a narrative of abundance focuses on how we get there. ... In the '80s Gov. (Bruce) Babbitt passed the Groundwater Management Act. California didn’t have the same policy instituted. An abundance narrative keeps us from getting cozy with history and forces us to look more forward. What is the next GMA that will carry us forward?

Q: How would you characterize academic water research in the West right now? Is it geared toward doing more with less water?

A: To a certain extent. It depends on who you ask. There’s hydrology, engineering, law, ecology. A lot of the conservation in the West is about efficiency and in particular reuse. Reuse rather than efficiency is the low-hanging fruit. In Arizona we reuse the majority of our water. Historically it’s something we’ve done pretty well. We have to ask ourselves what’s working.

Q: There are five program areas in the plan. One is urban efficiency. Is this intended to send a signal to business that we’re going to have the water they’ll need to operate here?

A: I think we do need a narrative like that, but we have to be careful. We don’t have to save water just to use it the way it’s being used now. We have to look at the highest possible use for that water.

Our mission statement is "abundant water for vibrant communities, economies and ecosystems." We worded it that way for a reason. It’s not how we can add more people to Phoenix, but how can we grow our quality of life? That might be more jobs, better jobs. Or it might be putting water back in the system to get to the (Colorado River) delta, and that would be water for ecosystems. You have to have those three components.

Scott Seckel

Reporter , ASU Now